Skip to main content
Tool comparison
COMPARE  /  jmeter-vs-gatling

JMeter vs Gatling

JMeter is a pure Java application: you build a test plan in its GUI and run it in GUI or CLI mode across many protocols. Gatling is code-first: simulations are written in Java, Kotlin, Scala, JavaScript or TypeScript on a non-blocking engine. Choose JMeter for protocol breadth and free distributed load; choose Gatling for tests that live in code review.

JMeter
The Apache Software Foundation's pure Java load testing application, with a GUI test plan editor, a CLI mode and built-in distributed testing.
Gatling
A code-first load testing tool with SDKs for Java, Kotlin, Scala, JavaScript and TypeScript, an open-source engine and a paid Enterprise Edition.

How do JMeter and Gatling compare?

JMeter vs Gatling, compared by dimension
How you write a testJMeterA test plan built in the GUI, saved as JMX XML, run in GUI or CLI modeGatlingA simulation written in code with a fluent SDK, run from Maven, Gradle, sbt or npm
LanguagesJMeterNo code for the plan; Groovy, JSR223 or BeanShell for scripted elementsGatlingJava, Kotlin, Scala, JavaScript, TypeScript
ArchitectureJMeterOne thread per virtual userGatlingNon-blocking, asynchronous engine designed for many users per node
ProtocolsJMeterHTTP(S), SOAP and REST, FTP, JDBC, LDAP, JMS, SMTP, POP3, IMAP, TCP, native commands, Java objectsGatlingHTTP, WebSocket, Server-Sent Events, JMS, gRPC and MQTT officially
Distributed loadJMeterBuilt in and free: a controller drives remote worker nodesGatlingCommunity Edition is local only; distributed load generation is an Enterprise Edition feature
ReportingJMeterListeners in the GUI and an HTML dashboard generated from the results fileGatlingA static HTML report per run in Community; live dashboards, history and trends in Enterprise
RecordingJMeterBuilt-in test script recorder proxies the browserGatlingRecorder and HAR file import
Version control and reviewJMeterJMX files are XML; diffs are noisy and review is hardGatlingPlain code, readable diffs, ordinary code review
Licence and costJMeterOpen source, Apache 2.0; no vendor cloudGatlingOpen source engine, Apache 2.0; Enterprise Edition is paid

When should you choose JMeter, and when Gatling?

Choose JMeter when

  • You need to load a database, message queue, LDAP directory or mail server, not only HTTP.
  • You need distributed load across several machines without buying a product.
  • The testers on the team prefer building a plan visually to writing code.
  • There is an existing library of JMX plans and JMeter expertise to protect.

Choose Gatling when

  • The team writes Java, Kotlin, Scala or TypeScript and wants load tests in the same repository and review process.
  • You want many virtual users from one machine and the non-blocking engine gives you that.
  • The systems under test are HTTP, WebSocket, gRPC or MQTT.
  • The organisation is willing to pay Enterprise Edition for dashboards, history and distributed runs.

How does JMeter vs Gatling come up in QA interviews?

Interviewers care less about which tool you used than whether you can design load and read results. Explaining the one-thread-per-user model against a non-blocking engine, and what each means for how many load generators you need, shows you understand the thing under the tool.

  1. 01Explain the difference between JMeter's threading model and Gatling's engine, and what it means for how much hardware a 10,000-user test needs.
  2. 02How would you put a JMeter test plan under code review, and what would you do differently with Gatling?
  3. 03A p95 of two seconds appears under load. How do you decide whether the load generator, the network or the application is the cause?
  4. 04When would you choose JMeter over Gatling even for an HTTP-only system?
Answer 2 Free Questions

No account needed · Scored in under a minute against a senior rubric

Common questions about JMeter vs Gatling

Is Gatling better than JMeter?

Gatling is better for teams who want load tests as code and many virtual users per machine. JMeter is better for protocol breadth, visual test building and free distributed load. Both produce reliable results when the load model is right, which is the part most teams get wrong.

Is Gatling free?

The Gatling engine is open source under Apache 2.0 and free for local runs, producing a static HTML report per run. Distributed load generation, live dashboards, run history and team features are in Gatling Enterprise Edition, which is paid.

Can JMeter run distributed tests?

Yes, and without a paid product: JMeter's distributed testing uses a controller that drives remote worker nodes. Setting it up means configuring the JMeter servers and network, which is where most of the effort goes.

Which should I learn for a performance testing role?

JMeter first: it is the tool most performance job descriptions name and its concepts, such as thread groups, samplers, timers and assertions, map to every other tool. Learn Gatling if the roles you want are engineering-led and mention performance tests in code.

EXEC.NOW

Ready to be asked about JMeter or Gatling?

Practice explaining the trade-off to an interviewer who knows both.

Join 500+ QA engineers already practicing with AssertHired.

Question 1 · Automation · Mid-levellive scoring

A test passes locally but fails in CI about one run in five. Walk me through what you check first, and why.

Scored on the same four dimensions as the real thing: Technical accuracy · Coverage · Clarity · Best practices.

Rather skip ahead? Create a free account

FREE.TO.START  ·  7.DAY.TRIAL ON PAID PLANS
Written by , Senior QA Automation Engineer, 50+ QA candidate interviews conductedLast updated July 2026